Hello all,
As I am sure you are aware, the government have recently introduced a Policing bill (Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill, 2021) which could drastically effect the way we are able to use our right to protest. This new legislation aims to restrict how we protest, and inflates the penalty for ‘unlawful’ protesting to an extortionate amount, whilst being intentionally vague on what they now consider ‘unlawful’ protests, allowing police to abuse their newly found power to stop us from using our voice as the people.
We as an SU condemn the government’s actions and aim to approach our local MP’s with this letter signed by as many students as possible.
If you would like your name added to this open letter, please sign below.
The letter will be sent to our Local MP’s on the 8th of April, please get all signatures in place by the 6th.
Thank you
Full Text of the Letter:
Dear Mr D Kawzcynski MP,
I am writing to you today to attempt to communicate to you the strength of the students’ voice at the University of Chester as I echo the views of students across the country. The new ‘Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill (2021)’, while overall exemplifying strong and necessary police and policy reform, contains numerous articles that have caused significant upset and worry to our student population. Through this letter I hope to bring some of these worries to your attention, in the hope that these can be acknowledged and addressed by the Government.
In recent weeks I have paid close attention to the public backlash that this Government has received as a result of the PCSC Bill passing its second reading. The massive public outcry has encouraged our students to pay more attention and voice their displeasure at the Government regarding several questionable articles, and it is their hope that the Government will take such a significant population’s opinions into consideration.
As I am sure you may expect, much of the feedback I have received is with regards to Part 3 of the Bill, which severely restricts the conditions in which public protests can take place. Firstly, under this new legislation, the Government aims to only allow pre-approved protests to go ahead, with the added restrictions of a defined start and end time. These impositions have a tendency to disrupt the base premise of a protest, which is defined as an action in objection to something. Imposing a legal requirement for pre-approval of protest activity from authorities may interfere with the impact of a protest and so have a chilling effect on participants’ freedom of speech.
Secondly, our students are increasingly concerned regarding the articles relating to a protest ‘noise limit’, in which it is stated that a protest can be forcibly moved or stopped should it become a ‘disruption to the community’. Due to the vague language employed throughout this section of the Bill our student body is, quite rightfully, worried that this may cause even law abiding protests to be arbitrarily and forcefully stopped, restricting their right to assembly. Furthermore, an especially worrying clause in this section of the Bill suggests that these regulations are valid even for a ‘one man protest’. I am sure you would agree that a single person protest could not in any way cause the ‘serious disruption’ required for police intervention and therefore this article should be revised entirely.
As previously stated, students are using their collective voice to contest some of the vague language used throughout this Bill. In our opinion, the policy change allowing police to move protesters based on an ‘ought to know’ basis has a concerning potential to be abused. The UK’s student population requests that you rethink this policy change as a matter of urgency; it is our fierce belief the public deserves to have the protection that the current evidence-based policy applies.
In light of the events of the last three weeks, particularly the horrific events at Sarah Everards vigil, I, on behalf of the student voice, urge you to stand up for the student body you represent and rethink the problematic and, frankly, oppressive nature of these articles. We as the United Kingdom should stand for peace and public power. This bill unfortunately strips the public of its voice, and I urge you to help us preserve it.
Kindest Regards,
Adam Kerr
Vice President for Shrewsbury
Chester Students’ Union.














